摸吉祥物女演员胸部，前塞尔塔队长马略被判赔偿1000欧（前塞尔塔队长马略因对吉祥物女演员不当接触被判赔偿1000欧元）

发布日期：2026-01-21

Asking clarifying questions
I think I should start by asking the user a clarifying question: Would they prefer details, sources, or a summary in Chinese? It might also help to inquire if they want context regarding the case, timeline, or appeals. I want to adopt a cautious approach since claims without sources can lead to defamation risks, so asking for permission to look up sources might be wise. If they just posted a headline, I could ask if they want a verification or summary with authoritative sources.Providing options for response

I’m thinking that since the harness requires specific approvals, it’s best to propose that we check. I should keep things concise. I can offer options for the user: 1) Verify via reputable sources and summarize; 2) Provide a neutral overview of known facts and legal context; 3) Translate or explain the headline; 4) Offer a timeline. I want to mention that we’ll only discuss what reliable outlets report, avoiding unverified assertions. Ultimately, I’ll ask what they prefer and offer to verify with sources while gathering relevant details. Also, I’ll respond in Chinese to match their language!


你是想确认这条新闻的真假，还是想要更多细节（案情经过、判决理由、是否可上诉、涉事各方回应、来源链接等）？
需要的话我可以：


帮你核实并汇总权威媒体的报道与时间线
解释判决中的法律要点（民事赔偿 vs. 刑事定罪、名誉/性骚扰相关条款等）
提供原文来源与关键引述

告诉我你更需要哪一种。若有链接也可直接发我核对。